Recent Posts in federal defense Category
| July 19, 2011 |
| What does "implied consent" mean for a DUI charge? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
 |
Usually the most powerful evidence that the prosecutor has in a DUI case is the breathalyzer result. This is rarely the only piece of evidence in a DUI case, but prosecutors rely heavily upon breathalyzer BAC (blood alcohol content) in the vast majority of cases. For this reason, the Virginia legislature has implemented Virginia Code Section 18.2-268.2, the Implied Consent Statute.
Essentially this statute provides that any person who operates a motor vehicle on a "highway" in the Commonwealth consents through such operation to have samples of their blood, breath, or both taken for a chemical analysis to determine the alcohol content in the blood. Unreasonable refusal to submit to a breath or blood test will result in a charge under 18.2-268.3 for refusal to take a breathalyzer.
There are a myriad of ways to attack the implied consent statute for those charged with unreasonable refusal, and there are a myriad of ways to use the implied consent statute to suppress a blood or breath result in a DUI case. One of the most glaring deficiencies in the implied consent statute is that it only applies on "highways". This does not mean that it is limited to interstates, or even to major streets; however, it does not include private property, and it does not include parking lots. A motorist who is stopped for DUI in a parking lot can be convicted of DUI, but operating a motor vehicle in a parking lot does not invoke the implied consent statute, because a parking lot is not a highway.
The implied consent statute also only applies if the defendant is arrested within 3 hours of the operation of the vehicle. Further, the implied consent statute applies only after a lawful arrest. Every DUI charge involving a breathalyzer result must be examined closely to find the possible defects in police conduct that can result in suppression of the result.
In Virginia, unreasonable refusal to submit to a breathalyzer results in a 1 year suspension of drivers license, pursuant to 18.2-268.3. The code specifically prohibits issuance of a restricted drivers license during this one year period. The result is that an individual convicted of unreasonable refusal cannot operate a motor vehicle anywhere for the next year. This is a serious sanction, and in many ways is worse than the penalties for the DUI itself!
The situation is different for individuals stopped for DUI on federal property (such as any of the military installations in Hampton Roads). Federal law provides for implied consent under 18 U.S.C. 3118, but it is not nearly as expansive (or as harsh), as the corresponding state code. The difference arises because licensure of drivers is a state function; in other words, we do not get our drivers licenses from the federal government, so the federal government does not control whether or not Americans possess a drivers license. Because of this, the only sanction for unreasonable refusal to provide a breath sample when arrested for DUI on federal property is loss of driving privileges on federal property for the next year (although the code also provides that the fact that the individual refused the breathalyzer may be admitted as evidence against them at trial for the DUI itself).
The bottom line is that if you have been charged with DUI, either in state or federal court, you need to call our office for a free consultation. Whether you took a breathalyzer or not, the implied consent statute can be used under the right circumstances as a tool against the government. The consultation is free, so let's sit down and discuss your case. |
|
| Continue reading "What does "implied consent" mean for a DUI charge?" » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| June 20, 2011 |
| What are the possible penalties for child pornography charges? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
Possession and distribution of child pornography are some of the most common felony charges that I deal with. Almost without exception, the individual was caught as part of a "catch a predator" type of sting, conducted by either federal or state law enforcement. Depending on the facts of the case, there is much that can be done to defend cases like these, particularly where the individual has not made a confession to law enforcement. When these stings are conducted, the law enforcement officers cannot see the subject of the sting, after all, the police are sitting on a computer somewhere far away from the subject of their investigation. Police rely on subpoenas for information such as the IP address of the subject computer, as well as the name of the host internet provider to attempt to identify who was using the computer when the alleged conduct took place.
These cases are extremely complex, and you must hire an attorney who understands computer forensics. Many very good lawyers are ill-suited to handle a child pornography case, simply because they do not understand the principles behind peer-to-peer networks, which are the primary means of transfer and receipt of child pornography in the internet age. But one thing is not complicated: the potential punishments for child pornography offenses. They are extremely harsh, across the board. Let's take a look.
It may seem patently unfair, but there is a tremendous difference between how child pornography charges are punished in the state versus federal systems. In Virginia, possession of child pornography under 18.2-374.1:1 is a Class 6 Felony, punishable by up to 5 years in the penitentiary. That sounds bad, and it is, but it's even worse when you consider that the Commonwealth's attorney can allege every image as a separate charge! It doesn't take long before the charges add up to a considerable amount of prison time. That being said, it is typical in Virginia to have an actual sentence significantly lower than the maximum punishment, with some portion of the total sentence suspended based upon compliance with judicial orders following release from prison.
As bad as that is, the federal system is far worse. There are several federal statues involving child pornography, but the most common is 18 U.S.C. 2252. This statute carries a possible 20 year sentence for a single count. The difference between the state and federal system is that a single federal count may actually result in a sentence approaching the maximum penalty! The reason for this is that the federal system's sentencing guidelines are typically much more severe than the state system. It is not unusual for an individual's sentencing guidelines in the federal system to come in at three or four times what they would be for the exact same child pornography offense in the state system. I get a lot of questions from clients in both systems wondering why the penalty ranges are so vastly different. I don't have a good answer for this, and frankly it is patently unfair that one defendant gets a sentence drastically longer than the other, simply by having the misfortune of being prosecuted in federal versus state court.
That being said, there are tactical decisions to be made when facing trial in the state court, simply based on the possibility that the feds may take interest in an ongoing state case, and simply take the matter over. This happens quite often, believe it or not, and when it does things have quickly gone from bad to way worse.
The bottom line is that possession and distribution of child pornography are some of the most serious charges you can face in Virginia. You must have an attorney who can handle these charges in both state and federal court, and has done so before. Computer forensics is a complicated field, and most attorneys don't know a thing about peer-to peer networks and the means by which these images are distributed today. Call an attorney who does, and who is ready to fight for you! |
|
| Continue reading "What are the possible penalties for child pornography charges?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| April 29, 2011 |
| Is it better to be prosecuted in a military court or a civilian court? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
I get this question fairly regularly, for a couple of reasons. First, because I practice exclusively criminal defense in southeastern Virginia, a large percentage of my clients are military. Second, not many attorneys around here practice in civilian courts as well as military courts, so few attorneys know the differences between the various systems. But the short answer to this question is: "it depends". Clients hate this answer because it sounds like the lawyer is being evasive, but the reality is that it truly does depend, and here is why:
First and foremost, there are certain offenses that are a big deal in the military, but might result in misdemeanor charges and minor penalties in state court. A good example is possession of a controlled substance. In civilian court, these charges often result in placement in the first offender program (if the defendant is eligible), which really is just probation, some classes, and a six month license suspension. On the other hand, in military court possession of controlled substances can easily result in many months in the brig, depending upon the circumstances. That is not to say that jail time is not possible in the civilian side, because it most certainly is, but simply that jail time is a virtual certainty in military court if you are convicted of this offense.
Similarly, if you don't come to work as a civilian, you might get fired. But if you continually don't come to work in the military, you will likely face court-martial, and potentially a long term in the brig. Same goes for disrespecting your boss. This is bad for your career as a civilian, but it can be bad for your freedom in the military. So in this way, there are some offenses that are better heard in civilian court than court martial.
On the other hand, there are other offenses that are much better in the military system. A good example is possession of child pornography. The problem with this offense in the federal and state systems (particularly federal) is that the sentencing guidelines are brutal. They are also somewhat arbitrary. Some prosecutors will charge every image as a separate offense, some will just charge a few and let others slide to keep the sentence reasonable. But the military system has no sentencing guidelines. All the military system has are maximum penalties for each offense. Without sentencing guidelines, an effective defense attorney can get outstanding sentences in military court on child pornography cases; often times just a fraction of what would be imposed in the state or federal system.
There are differences in procedure as well. In military cases, the prosecutor must turn over virtually all the evidence in the case, and must do so early in the process. Civilian discovery (particularly in state court) is far more limited. For this reason, it is much more difficult to anticipate what the prosecutor will do in civilian court.
There are countless other differences, far more than I can explain in this posting. But what should matter to you is that your lawyer understands these differences.
If you are facing criminal charges, and you are in the military, you owe it to yourself to contact an attorney who knows both the civilian and military systems inside and out... and I can tell you that there are few of us around who do. Do your homework, and make sure that you are dealing with a lawyer who can fight for you wherever your charges ultimately end up. Contact us, we are here to help! |
|
| Continue reading "Is it better to be prosecuted in a military court or a civilian court?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |