Recent Posts in dui roadblock Category
| April 04, 2011 |
| DUI loopholes? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
 |
Many people simply assume that because they are charged with a DUI, they will ultimately be convicted and that there is nothing to be done to fight the charge. For this reason, they often hire the least expensive attorney they can find and plead guilty as quickly as they can. While there are times when taking a plea agreement is the right course of action for a DUI, there are many other times where aggressively attacking the charges is the right approach. You need a lawyer who is able to recognize the difference, and knows how to do both.
Recent changes in the Virginia Code with respect to DUI have created a uniquely favorable set of conditions for a skilled DUI defense attorney. Virginia Code 18.2-268.9 was redrafted in response to a ground-breaking series of United States Supreme Court cases, beginning with
Crawford v. Washington in 2004 and ending most recently with
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts in 2009. These cases arose from the premise in the
6th Amendment that "an accused... shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him". This seems like an innocuous concept, but the reality is much more burdensome upon prosecuting attorneys. The number of people that are involved with a simple DUI stop is far more than you might initially think. You may only see the officer that stopped you, but what about the officer that conducted the breath test? What about the technician that made sure the breathalyzer was working properly? If your case involved a blood draw, how many people were involved in the drawing, handling, and testing of that sample? If your case involved a DUI checkpoint, who set it up, and who authorized the checkpoint?
For years in Virginia, prior to Melendez-Diaz, courts would routinely admit into evidence "Certificates of Analysis" which contained statements from various individuals who were not present at trial, but who played a part in the analysis or handling of breath and blood samples. This practice has been substantially limited, by and large because of
Melendez-Diaz and also due to changes in the Virginia Code. But the Code has not evolved as quickly as the caselaw, and there are highly technical avenues for an aggressive DUI attorney to fight for exclusion of documents that would result in a conviction.
You must ask yourself what you are paying for when you hire a DUI lawyer. If you just want an attorney to show up to court and help you plead guilty, then there are plenty of attorneys for that purpose. If you want an attorney who will explore every possible avenue of acquittal, and make the government work for every inch of ground, then CONTACT US... We aggressively attack every DUI charge, and you deserve nothing less. |
|
| Continue reading "DUI loopholes?" » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| December 10, 2010 |
| What happens to my drivers license after a DUI? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
This is one of the biggest concerns for most citizens in DUI cases. Often times individuals can afford to pay the fines, particularly if they are already considering hiring an attorney; and jail sentences are usually measured in days on simple DUI cases, rather than weeks or months. However, drivers license issues can go on for months, and even years in the most serious cases.
DUIs can affect an individual's driving privileges in two ways. First, 46.2-391.2 of the Virginia Code provides for an administrative suspension of your drivers license if you are arrested for DUI. Essentially, the officer will seize your drivers license on scene and return it to the court for disposition. The length of seizure will depend upon how many times the individual has been convicted of DUI. Someone charged with a first offense will lose their license for seven days. A second offense charge results in a 60 day loss of license. For a third or subsequent offense, the license is suspended until the date of trial.
That's just the beginning though. Once you actually go to trial, the judge will revoke your license upon conviction of a first offense for a period of one year. The judge cannot suspend any of this time. A second offense within 10 years means an automatic 3 year license suspension. A third offense results in an indefinite revocation of your privilege to drive (however, you may apply for reinstatement after 3 years with a restricted license; and after 5 years for an unrestricted license).
For first and second offense DUIs the judge may, and often does, authorize the issuance or a restricted drivers license (the judge cannot authorize a restricted license if you are convicted of refusing to take a breathalyzer). The terms of restricted licenses are up to the judge, but typically they allow an individual to drive to work, drive during work (if required by the job), drive to school, daycare, medical appointments, and alcohol counseling. The judge will determine what the specific terms of a restricted license are on a case by case basis.
Many people are so concerned about not going to jail that they forget about the loss of license and the drastic affect that can have on your life. The reality is that the affects on one's license are some of the most lasting and serious problems with a DUI conviction. If you are facing DUI charges anywhere in Hampton Roads, call us right away! We focus on DUIs, and are here to defend you charge and keep you driving! |
|
| Continue reading "What happens to my drivers license after a DUI?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| December 07, 2010 |
| 'Tis the season for DUI checkpoints! |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
The holidays are fast approaching, and there are more and more reasons why individuals might find themselves a few drinks deep at a location other than their homes. You can rest assured that local police departments will be conducting roadblocks in the coming weeks to deter people from getting in their cars and driving home after a night of drinking. But anyone who has taken a basic law class or read the Constitution knows that law enforcement can't just pull a vehicle over for no reason at all. There must be "reasonable suspicion" that criminal activity is afoot. Without reasonable suspicion, officers cannot stop a citizen in his travels.
Well, sort of. Because courts have carved out many exceptions to this fundamental Constitutional principle. And one of these exceptions is for DUI roadblocks, or checkpoints. Courts in Virginia (and just about everywhere else), allow DUI checkpoints under certain very limited guidelines because of the state's interest in protecting the public from drunk drivers. That being said, DUI checkpoints must adhere to very strict rules, or the arrests from the operation can be dismissed in court. Individual police officers do not have the authority to set up a DUI checkpoint on their own. Instead, the checkpoint must be conducted in accordance with a plan approved by the police department at the highest levels, and must limit the discretion of the police officers. For example, the plan must establish what time the checkpoint will be conducted, where it will be conducted, and how vehicles will be selected for stop (e.g. stop every third vehicle). If the plan is not specific, or if the plan is not followed, the results can be thrown out of court as an unlawful stop.
If you have been stopped at a DUI checkpoint, contact our office right away. We will fight at every turn to find error in the handling of the checkpoint. DUI checkpoints do more to snarl traffic than they do to deter drunk drivers. We fight every DUI aggressively; but where checkpoints and roadblocks are in play, we have more ammunition than ever! |
|
| Continue reading "'Tis the season for DUI checkpoints!" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |