Recent Posts in alcohol Category
| September 24, 2011 |
| My BAC is over .08, I guess I have to plead guilty... |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
 |
Not true!
I can't tell you how often I hear clients who feel absolutely defeated by the fact that they were stopped for DUI and produced a breathalyzer result over .08. "Over the limit, under arrest", right? Well, being over the limit can certainly get you arrested, but there is a long road between arrest and conviction, and an aggressive and experienced DUI attorney knows how to turn that road into a treacherous minefield for the prosecution.
First and foremost, unlike some states, Virginia does not have what is called a "per se" DUI statute. The best way to compare a "per se" DUI statute to Virginia's DUI statute is by example. As it turns out, North Carolina has a "per se" DUI statute. §20-138.1 of the General Statutes of North Carolina provides that a motorist shall be guilty of driving under the influence where "he has, at any relevant time after driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. The results of a chemical analysis shall be deemed sufficient evidence to prove a person's alcohol concentration."
Virginia's statute is different, however, and has been interpreted by the Virginia Supreme Court to mean that the result of a breathalyzer or blood test only creates what is called a "permissive inference" that the blood alcohol at the time of the breathalyzer was the same as the blood alcohol at the time of driving. This seems like a minor point, but cases are won and lost on minor points.
What this really means to the DUI practitioner is that in North Carolina, once the motorist submits a breathalyzer over 0.08, the case is essentially over (unless there was no reason to stop the vehicle in the first place, etc.).
However, in Virginia, that BAC over 0.08 is only indicative of the BAC at the time of the breath sample, not necessarily at the time of operation of the vehicle. This is a critical distinction, because the only BAC that matters in Virginia is the BAC at the time of operation of the vehicle.
This is where things get interesting; and where things get scientific. The science of blood alcohol is far more complex than can be explored in this posting. Suffice it to say that blood alcohol is a constantly changing variable. It changes with time, with alcohol intake, with food intake, with metabolism, and with countless other factors. If you have ever consumed alcohol, you know that the effects are not felt immediately. Think about it like this: if you take two bottles of beer and drink them as quickly as possible, you do not feel the effects right away. But perhaps 30 minutes later you will begin to feel some measure of intoxication. Why is there a delay? Shouldn't you feel the aclohol as soon as it's in your body? The answer is that the effects of intoxication are not felt until the alcohol actually gets into the brain, and to get there, it must first process through the digestive system, through the lining of the stomach and into the blood stream, only then can it flow into the brain to affect the central nervous system. This takes time. How much time? Well, it varies from person to person, and upon other variables such as food intake, speed and volume of alcohol intake, fatigue, metabolism, etc.
The reason why this is so important is that it is entirely possible for an individual to consume some amount of alcohol and then operate a vehicle with a BAC that is slowly rising, but never exceeding 0.08. This individual could be stopped on suspicion of DUI with a BAC of say, 0.07 (but still rising). By the time they get to the police station, that BAC could be drastically higher (and well above 0.08). In North Carolina (because of the "per se" statute), it makes no difference that the BAC at the time of the breathalyzer was higher than it was at the time of operation of the vehicle. But in Virginia, a skilled DUI attorney can demonstrate to the judge or jury through scientific evidence that the BAC could have been much lower at the time of operation of the vehicle than it was at the time of the breathalyzer; thereby rendering the breathalyzer result essentially meaningless. This is where things like performance on the field sobriety tests and testimony of witnesses to the individual's drinking can be absolutely essential, along with an understanding of the science of blood alcohol and it's effect upon the central nervous system.
The bottom line is that DUI litigation is a tremendously complicated field. If you are the kind of person who can't have a DUI on your record, you need to contact our office. Our rates are reasonable, but we know the law and the science of DUIs, and can apply both to winning your case! |
|
| Continue reading "My BAC is over .08, I guess I have to plead guilty..." » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| April 04, 2011 |
| DUI loopholes? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
Many people simply assume that because they are charged with a DUI, they will ultimately be convicted and that there is nothing to be done to fight the charge. For this reason, they often hire the least expensive attorney they can find and plead guilty as quickly as they can. While there are times when taking a plea agreement is the right course of action for a DUI, there are many other times where aggressively attacking the charges is the right approach. You need a lawyer who is able to recognize the difference, and knows how to do both.
Recent changes in the Virginia Code with respect to DUI have created a uniquely favorable set of conditions for a skilled DUI defense attorney. Virginia Code 18.2-268.9 was redrafted in response to a ground-breaking series of United States Supreme Court cases, beginning with
Crawford v. Washington in 2004 and ending most recently with
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts in 2009. These cases arose from the premise in the
6th Amendment that "an accused... shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him". This seems like an innocuous concept, but the reality is much more burdensome upon prosecuting attorneys. The number of people that are involved with a simple DUI stop is far more than you might initially think. You may only see the officer that stopped you, but what about the officer that conducted the breath test? What about the technician that made sure the breathalyzer was working properly? If your case involved a blood draw, how many people were involved in the drawing, handling, and testing of that sample? If your case involved a DUI checkpoint, who set it up, and who authorized the checkpoint?
For years in Virginia, prior to Melendez-Diaz, courts would routinely admit into evidence "Certificates of Analysis" which contained statements from various individuals who were not present at trial, but who played a part in the analysis or handling of breath and blood samples. This practice has been substantially limited, by and large because of
Melendez-Diaz and also due to changes in the Virginia Code. But the Code has not evolved as quickly as the caselaw, and there are highly technical avenues for an aggressive DUI attorney to fight for exclusion of documents that would result in a conviction.
You must ask yourself what you are paying for when you hire a DUI lawyer. If you just want an attorney to show up to court and help you plead guilty, then there are plenty of attorneys for that purpose. If you want an attorney who will explore every possible avenue of acquittal, and make the government work for every inch of ground, then CONTACT US... We aggressively attack every DUI charge, and you deserve nothing less. |
|
| Continue reading "DUI loopholes?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| March 15, 2011 |
| DUI law in Virginia and Melendez-Diaz |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
Many people, and unfortunately many attorneys, consider a DUI to be a simple charge. To the uninitiated, it may appear that there is no way to beat a DUI. The defendant generally had been drinking, and the breathalyzer usually indicated as much. Is that the end of the story? Not hardly.
Among the myriad of tools that an aggressive DUI defense has in his tool box is the recent Supreme Court decision in United States v. Melendez-Diaz. At first blush,
Melendez-Diaz has nothing to do with DUI litigation. In fact, the case deals with the requirement in drug cases that the state produce live testimony from technicians from the laboratory instead of printed laboratory reports to show the chemical makeup of suspected narcotics. The basis for this holding is that every American has the right under the
6th Amendment to "confront witnesses against him" in a criminal prosecution. Essentially, the state cannot print out a report from a mysterious lab technician and then present that report as evidence at trial without the defendant having the opportunity to cross examine the technician who conducted the actual testing. That being said, for decades previous to
Melendez-Diaz, that is exactly what was done.
So what does all this have to do with DUI law? Well, if you have recently been charged with DUI, you should have in your possession a green piece of paper with "Department of Forensic Science" printed at the top of the page. There is a complex series of statutes that governs the admissibility of this document, most of which have been recently enacted in response to Melendez-Diaz. An aggressive and informed criminal defense attorney knows that there are ways to fight the admissibility of this document based upon the 6th Amendment and
Melendez-Diaz, depending upon the circumstances. Do not accept the admission of this document as a foregone conclusion. Hire a lawyer who is willing to attack this document to keep it out of the court's consideration.
Contact us right away. We are here to help! |
|
| Continue reading "DUI law in Virginia and Melendez-Diaz" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| February 08, 2011 |
| Charged with selling alcohol to a minor? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
I see more and more clients charged with selling alcohol to underage persons in violation of Virginia Code Section 4.1-304, which prohibits sale of alcohol when the seller "knows or has reason to believe" that the purchaser is under 21 years old. Many hard working Virginians in the service industry or working at grocery and convenience stores sell alcohol hundreds of times a day in the course of their employment. These people do their best to ensure that they aren't selling to minors, but sometimes there are external pressures or simple fatigue that cause a lapse in vigilence, leading to an unlawful sale. The Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is constantly conducting stings on local alcohol venders, looking for occassions where minors are able to successfully make an illegal purchase. The stings are generally conducted using minors aged 17-19 under the supervision of a senior ABC agent who watches the purchase from a distance.
The ramifications of being caught in one of these stings are huge, especially for the individual who allows such a sale. First, the criminal charge is a Class 1 misdemeanor, carrying up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $2,500. But second, and perhaps even more severely, these individuals are often fired from their jobs upon conviction.
The employers know that ABC will come after them for large civil penalties, typically $2,000 for a first offense. For this reason, they tend to be merciless on the employee who accidently engaged in the sale.
If you have been charged for sale of alcohol to a minor, contact us right away. There is much that an aggressive lawyer can do to attack this charge. Don't accept a conviction as a foregone conclusion, as it may cost you your job, a lot of money, and perhaps even your freedom... Don't let this happen to you! |
|
| Continue reading "Charged with selling alcohol to a minor?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |