Recent Blog Posts in July 2011 |
| July 19, 2011 |
| What does "implied consent" mean for a DUI charge? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
 |
Usually the most powerful evidence that the prosecutor has in a DUI case is the breathalyzer result. This is rarely the only piece of evidence in a DUI case, but prosecutors rely heavily upon breathalyzer BAC (blood alcohol content) in the vast majority of cases. For this reason, the Virginia legislature has implemented Virginia Code Section 18.2-268.2, the Implied Consent Statute.
Essentially this statute provides that any person who operates a motor vehicle on a "highway" in the Commonwealth consents through such operation to have samples of their blood, breath, or both taken for a chemical analysis to determine the alcohol content in the blood. Unreasonable refusal to submit to a breath or blood test will result in a charge under 18.2-268.3 for refusal to take a breathalyzer.
There are a myriad of ways to attack the implied consent statute for those charged with unreasonable refusal, and there are a myriad of ways to use the implied consent statute to suppress a blood or breath result in a DUI case. One of the most glaring deficiencies in the implied consent statute is that it only applies on "highways". This does not mean that it is limited to interstates, or even to major streets; however, it does not include private property, and it does not include parking lots. A motorist who is stopped for DUI in a parking lot can be convicted of DUI, but operating a motor vehicle in a parking lot does not invoke the implied consent statute, because a parking lot is not a highway.
The implied consent statute also only applies if the defendant is arrested within 3 hours of the operation of the vehicle. Further, the implied consent statute applies only after a lawful arrest. Every DUI charge involving a breathalyzer result must be examined closely to find the possible defects in police conduct that can result in suppression of the result.
In Virginia, unreasonable refusal to submit to a breathalyzer results in a 1 year suspension of drivers license, pursuant to 18.2-268.3. The code specifically prohibits issuance of a restricted drivers license during this one year period. The result is that an individual convicted of unreasonable refusal cannot operate a motor vehicle anywhere for the next year. This is a serious sanction, and in many ways is worse than the penalties for the DUI itself!
The situation is different for individuals stopped for DUI on federal property (such as any of the military installations in Hampton Roads). Federal law provides for implied consent under 18 U.S.C. 3118, but it is not nearly as expansive (or as harsh), as the corresponding state code. The difference arises because licensure of drivers is a state function; in other words, we do not get our drivers licenses from the federal government, so the federal government does not control whether or not Americans possess a drivers license. Because of this, the only sanction for unreasonable refusal to provide a breath sample when arrested for DUI on federal property is loss of driving privileges on federal property for the next year (although the code also provides that the fact that the individual refused the breathalyzer may be admitted as evidence against them at trial for the DUI itself).
The bottom line is that if you have been charged with DUI, either in state or federal court, you need to call our office for a free consultation. Whether you took a breathalyzer or not, the implied consent statute can be used under the right circumstances as a tool against the government. The consultation is free, so let's sit down and discuss your case. |
|
| Continue reading "What does "implied consent" mean for a DUI charge?" » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| July 12, 2011 |
| What are Virginia child abuse laws? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
I frequently meet with distraught parents who have been charged with child neglect or abuse. In most cases, these are loving parents who either lacked the skills and resources to effectively care for their children; or in many cases these are parents being accused of something they simply did not do. These parents and guardians are confused and scared, so it is important first and foremost to have an understanding of the Virginia Code as it relates to child abuse and neglect. The good news is that I am going to go over much of it in this article. The bad news is that it is still terribly complex (as you will no doubt see). The bottom line is that if you are facing any charge in Virginia relating to abuse or neglect of a child, you need to contact us right away. That being said, here is the rundown:
The Commonwealth's Attorney always has the liberty to charge crimes against children under the general statutes; be it Murder in any degree, assault and battery,
malicious wounding, or any of a myriad of
sexual abuse charges. These types of charges are discussed elsewhere on this website, so I will not go into them further here. Instead, I want to focus on the types of charges that are specifically directed at abuse and neglect of children.
The most serious child abuse charge is under Virginia Code Section 18.2-371.1, Abuse and Neglect of Children. Within this code section are two different offenses, the more serious is a class 4 felony, carrying up to 10 years in the penitentiary. The lesser offense is a class 6 felony, carrying up to 5 years in the penitentiary. Both offenses require that the accused be the "parent, guardian, or other person responsible for the care of a child under the age of 18". So you can see one possible defense right there, if you do not fit that definition under the law, you cannot be convicted of either offense (although you may still be guilty of another offense, such as assault and battery). The code requires that the accused "willful act or omission or refusal to provide any necessary care... causes serious injury to the life or health of such child" to be guilty of the class 4 felony. The code defines "serious injury" as including, but not limited to "(1) disfigurement, (2) a fracture, (3) a severe burn or laceration, (4) mutilation, (5) maiming, (6) forced ingestion of dangerous substances, (7) life-threatening internal injuries." Unless the accused's act or failure to act directly causes one of these conditions or a comparable condition, they cannot be convicted of the class 4 felony.
That being said, the code allows for a lesser offense within the same statute for a class 6 felony. The code provides that any parent, guardian, etc. whose "willful act or omission in the care of such child was so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show a reckless disregard for human life shall be guilty of a class 6 felony". As you can see, there is no actual injury required under this part of the code. As long as the responsible adult's conduct showed reckless disregard for the child's life, they can be convicted of this less severe (but still very serious) charge.
As you can see, there are two theories for conviction for both of these felony charges. One is a specific act, the other is a failure to act. In other words, it is not always a defense to say "I didn't do anything". The idea is that a responsible adult has an obligation to act under certain circumstances. Doing nothing is sometimes not acceptable. A good way of looking at this would be to think of a firearm in the home. A responsible parent ought to secure firearms in the home, particularly where the children are of an age where they may be curious but not yet capable of understanding the consequences of using a firearm. For this reason, a parent might be charged under one of these statutes for failure to secure a firearm if the result of such failure was the death of a third party at the hands of an armed child. This is just an example, and should not be considered as controlling or limiting in any way.
Cases involving neglect and abuse of children are not always felonies. In fact, in most child abuse and neglect cases emerge as misdemeanors. Code Section 18.2-371 is the basic Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor statute in Virginia. This statute makes it a class 1 misdemeanor, punishable by up to 12 months in jail, for any person over 18 years of age who "willfully contributes to, encourages, or causes any act, omission, or condition which renders a child delinquent, in need of services, in need of supervision, or abused or neglected". This is still a serious offense, but far less serious than the felonies discussed previously. These cases typically involve a lack of supervision, or perhaps even active facilitation, on the part of an adult which causes a child to engage in illegal or dangerous conduct. These cases often involve allowing minors access to drugs or alcohol.
There is a final way in which these types of charges can be brought in Virginia, although it is rarely used. Within the Child Labor section of the code is Section 40.1-103, which prohibits any "person employing or having custody" of a child causing or permitting the life of the child to be endangered or the health of the child to be injured. Violation of this section is a class 6 felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison. This is an unusual charge, given that it falls under the child labor prohibitions, but it is brought from time to time.
As you can see, there are a myriad of ways that Virginians can be charged with abuse or neglect of a child. These cases are exceedingly difficult, because invariably the parents or guardians love their children and the best for them. If you are facing these types of charges, do not wait... contact us right away. We are here to help!
|
|
| Continue reading "What are Virginia child abuse laws?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |