Recent Blog Posts in April 2011 |
| April 29, 2011 |
| Is it better to be prosecuted in a military court or a civilian court? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
 |
I get this question fairly regularly, for a couple of reasons. First, because I practice exclusively criminal defense in southeastern Virginia, a large percentage of my clients are military. Second, not many attorneys around here practice in civilian courts as well as military courts, so few attorneys know the differences between the various systems. But the short answer to this question is: "it depends". Clients hate this answer because it sounds like the lawyer is being evasive, but the reality is that it truly does depend, and here is why:
First and foremost, there are certain offenses that are a big deal in the military, but might result in misdemeanor charges and minor penalties in state court. A good example is possession of a controlled substance. In civilian court, these charges often result in placement in the first offender program (if the defendant is eligible), which really is just probation, some classes, and a six month license suspension. On the other hand, in military court possession of controlled substances can easily result in many months in the brig, depending upon the circumstances. That is not to say that jail time is not possible in the civilian side, because it most certainly is, but simply that jail time is a virtual certainty in military court if you are convicted of this offense.
Similarly, if you don't come to work as a civilian, you might get fired. But if you continually don't come to work in the military, you will likely face court-martial, and potentially a long term in the brig. Same goes for disrespecting your boss. This is bad for your career as a civilian, but it can be bad for your freedom in the military. So in this way, there are some offenses that are better heard in civilian court than court martial.
On the other hand, there are other offenses that are much better in the military system. A good example is possession of child pornography. The problem with this offense in the federal and state systems (particularly federal) is that the sentencing guidelines are brutal. They are also somewhat arbitrary. Some prosecutors will charge every image as a separate offense, some will just charge a few and let others slide to keep the sentence reasonable. But the military system has no sentencing guidelines. All the military system has are maximum penalties for each offense. Without sentencing guidelines, an effective defense attorney can get outstanding sentences in military court on child pornography cases; often times just a fraction of what would be imposed in the state or federal system.
There are differences in procedure as well. In military cases, the prosecutor must turn over virtually all the evidence in the case, and must do so early in the process. Civilian discovery (particularly in state court) is far more limited. For this reason, it is much more difficult to anticipate what the prosecutor will do in civilian court.
There are countless other differences, far more than I can explain in this posting. But what should matter to you is that your lawyer understands these differences.
If you are facing criminal charges, and you are in the military, you owe it to yourself to contact an attorney who knows both the civilian and military systems inside and out... and I can tell you that there are few of us around who do. Do your homework, and make sure that you are dealing with a lawyer who can fight for you wherever your charges ultimately end up. Contact us, we are here to help! |
|
| Continue reading "Is it better to be prosecuted in a military court or a civilian court?" » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| April 20, 2011 |
| What is a statute of limitations? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
Statutes of limitations are set periods of time following an alleged criminal act after which a criminal prosecution may not commence. In other words, once the statute of limitations has passed, you are in the clear! That's the good news. The bad news is that Virginia is one of 7 states, along with North Carolina, South Carolina, Maryland, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Wyoming (noticing a geographic trend?), that have no statute of limitations for felonies. So you can be prosecuted for a felony committed in Virginia no matter how long ago the alleged act occurred.
However, Virginia does have statutes of limitations for misdemeanors. The general rule is that the statute of limitations for misdemeanors is 1 year. These are governed by Virginia Code Section 19.2-8. There are exceptions, however. Petit larceny must be prosecuted within 5 years. Unlawful abortion must be prosecuted within 2 years. There are various other exceptions for offenses rarely charged, often involving campaign finance crimes and malfeasance in office. Some of these apply in felonies as well.
The bottom line is that if you are charged for an offense that occurred long ago, you need to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney. It may be possible, depending upon the crime, to secure a complete dismissal of the charges based upon the statute of limitations. Only by talking to an experienced defense attorney will you know if this is an option in your case. Contact us today, we are here to help. |
|
| Continue reading "What is a statute of limitations?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| April 15, 2011 |
| Child Pornography "To Catch a Predator" Stings |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
There was a time when possession and distribution of child pornography was rarely prosecuted because child pornography was part of a secretive sub-culture that dealt in the mailing of actual images of child pornography, often produced in Eastern Europe, to consumers willing to pay top dollar in the United States and elsewhere. There was also a time when people bought CD's at the mall. But the internet changed all that. Suddenly what you used to have to pay good money for became easily accessible and free via the world wide web. As a consequence of technology, many people who would never have had access to child pornography before the advent of the internet found themselves easily accessing it through their home computer.
But if you are doing this, you are going to get caught. Here's how:
Most internet exchange of child pornography occurs through what are called "peer to peer" networks. Peer to peer originated with the now defunct "Napster" network, and has developed through the years to Limewire, Kazaa, Gnutella, and countless others. These networks involve the sharing of digital media (songs, movies, etc.) through the internet. Membership in a peer to peer network requires a user to create what is called a "shared file" on their computer. A shared file is where the peer to peer user makes available some of their own computer files so that other users on the network can download the files to their own computer through the network. In exchange for making your files available for download, you can download a proportional amount of files from other users on the same network. This seems like a harmless arrangement, but there are serious problems with it in terms of your expectation of privacy.
Think of it like this: if you are smoking marijuana in your front yard and a police officer walks by and sees what you are doing, he can arrest you. You have no expectation of privacy in your front yard, so the officer can take action for what he sees you doing in such an open manner. However, if you smoke marijuana in your basement and the officer walks by, he (a) won't know what you are doing, and (b) even if he does, he still needs a warrant to mess with you. That is because you DO have an expectation of privacy in your basement.
Let's return to the peer to peer situation. If you are at home on your computer looking at files on your internal media, like the hard drive, you have an expectation of privacy. Law enforcement can't look into your hard drive without a warrant. But if you place files into the shared drive, then everyone who can download them (i.e. anyone on the peer to peer network), can see them! So you have no expectation of privacy.
Here's where it gets interesting. Every image on the internet (yes, every image), has a unique "hash value". That picture you just posted on facebook? It has a unique hash value. Well, so does every picture of child porn on the internet. You can rename images all day long, but the hash value NEVER CHANGES. The police aren't stupid. They know the hash values of hundreds, if not thousands of known images of child pornography. All they do is run massive searches for hash values of known images of child pornography through the shared files of peer to peer networks looking for matches. When they find matches, they identify the IP address (unique to the computer) of the user, and get a warrant. Then they come to your house, seize all electronic media, and arrest you.
So you see, it is exceedingly easy to get caught if you are looking at child pornography. It is a virtual certainty. But if it has happened to you, or someone you love, contact us immediately! The stakes are high, and you must hire an attorney who understands this complex area of criminal defense, and is ready to fight for you! |
|
| Continue reading "Child Pornography "To Catch a Predator" Stings" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| April 04, 2011 |
| DUI loopholes? |
| Posted By Shawn Cline |
|
Many people simply assume that because they are charged with a DUI, they will ultimately be convicted and that there is nothing to be done to fight the charge. For this reason, they often hire the least expensive attorney they can find and plead guilty as quickly as they can. While there are times when taking a plea agreement is the right course of action for a DUI, there are many other times where aggressively attacking the charges is the right approach. You need a lawyer who is able to recognize the difference, and knows how to do both.
Recent changes in the Virginia Code with respect to DUI have created a uniquely favorable set of conditions for a skilled DUI defense attorney. Virginia Code 18.2-268.9 was redrafted in response to a ground-breaking series of United States Supreme Court cases, beginning with
Crawford v. Washington in 2004 and ending most recently with
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts in 2009. These cases arose from the premise in the
6th Amendment that "an accused... shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him". This seems like an innocuous concept, but the reality is much more burdensome upon prosecuting attorneys. The number of people that are involved with a simple DUI stop is far more than you might initially think. You may only see the officer that stopped you, but what about the officer that conducted the breath test? What about the technician that made sure the breathalyzer was working properly? If your case involved a blood draw, how many people were involved in the drawing, handling, and testing of that sample? If your case involved a DUI checkpoint, who set it up, and who authorized the checkpoint?
For years in Virginia, prior to Melendez-Diaz, courts would routinely admit into evidence "Certificates of Analysis" which contained statements from various individuals who were not present at trial, but who played a part in the analysis or handling of breath and blood samples. This practice has been substantially limited, by and large because of
Melendez-Diaz and also due to changes in the Virginia Code. But the Code has not evolved as quickly as the caselaw, and there are highly technical avenues for an aggressive DUI attorney to fight for exclusion of documents that would result in a conviction.
You must ask yourself what you are paying for when you hire a DUI lawyer. If you just want an attorney to show up to court and help you plead guilty, then there are plenty of attorneys for that purpose. If you want an attorney who will explore every possible avenue of acquittal, and make the government work for every inch of ground, then CONTACT US... We aggressively attack every DUI charge, and you deserve nothing less. |
|
| Continue reading "DUI loopholes?" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |